1. Theory
- Definition: A nanoelectromechanical (NEMS) memory cell is an electrostatically actuated beam (cantilever or bridge) whose two mechanical positions, open and in contact, are the two memory states.
- Placement: The state is stored in the position of a moving part, not in charge, magnetization, polarization or a filament.
- Non-volatility: If contact adhesion exceeds the beam’s restoring force, the beam stays closed with no applied voltage.
- Beam mechanics: Cantilever stiffness and resonance set the switching voltage and speed.
- Pull-in instability: Electrostatic force grows as while spring force grows linearly, so the beam snaps down at one third of the gap.
- Hysteresis: The release voltage is below the pull-in voltage, and adhesion widens the gap between them.
2. Working Principle
- Write closed: A gate voltage above pulls the beam into contact.
- Hold: Adhesion (van der Waals, ) keeps the beam closed without power.
- Write open: A reverse or release action overcomes adhesion and the beam springs back.
- Read: The contact resistance (Holm or Sharvin constriction resistance) distinguishes closed from open.
- Speed: Closing time is of order the mechanical period, nanoseconds to microseconds, much slower than transistors.
- Energy and voltage: Switching energy is small, but pull-in voltages above 1 V exceed modern logic supplies.
3. Applications
- Current status: Research devices; not in commercial memory products.
- Harsh-environment memory and logic (target): Near-zero leakage, high-temperature and radiation-tolerant storage where transistors fail.
| Name | Formula | Related Formulae | Variables/Constants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cantilever spring constant and resonance | |||
| Electrostatic actuation and pull-in | |||
| Release voltage and hysteresis | |||
| Adhesion force between flat surfaces | |||
| Pull-in switching time | |||
| Contact resistance (Holm and Sharvin) | |||
| Switching energy |
Important Questions
Ques: How does a nanoelectromechanical (NEMS) memory store a bit?
A NEMS memory cell is a beam (a cantilever or a doubly clamped bridge) of a conductor or a semiconductor suspended over a gate and a contact electrode. The two states are the beam in the up position and in the contact position, which gives a high and a low resistance between the beam and the contact (the electrical read). The beam is pulled down by an electrostatic force and released by a lower voltage because of the pull-in hysteresis (). If the adhesion force at the contact exceeds the restoring force of the beam, the beam stays down with no applied voltage, and the cell is non-volatile. The state is read as the contact resistance and the write is an electrostatic pull-in or release. Reference: V. Pott et al., “Mechanical computing redux: relays for integrated circuit applications,” Proc. IEEE 98, 2076 (2010); O. Loh and H.D. Espinosa, “Nanoelectromechanical contact switches,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 283 (2012).
Ques: Why is there a pull-in at one third of the gap, and how does it scale?
The electrostatic force rises as while the spring force rises linearly with . The balance is stable until the deflection reaches , where the slopes of the two forces become equal, so beyond this point the beam snaps down at the voltage . The pull-in voltage therefore falls as the gap is reduced () and as the beam is made softer (), and for a cantilever , so a thin, long beam switches at a low voltage. The cost is a lower resonant frequency, a lower restoring force against adhesion and a higher risk of permanent stiction. Reference: S.D. Senturia, Microsystem Design, Kluwer, 2001; H.C. Nathanson, W.E. Newell, R.A. Wickstrom and J.R. Davis, “The resonant gate transistor,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 14, 117 (1967).
Ques: What limits the speed and the energy of a NEMS memory?
The mechanical closing time is of the order of the resonant period, for a drive voltage well above pull-in (undamped; 3.67 in Senturia, see the next question), so a stiff and light beam gives a few nanoseconds to a microsecond, much slower than a transistor. The electrical energy per operation is of the order of , which is small for a small gap and area, but the voltage is above one volt (pull-in), which is high compared with the supply voltage of a modern logic process. The device is therefore attractive for low-leakage and high-temperature applications, not for speed. Reference: S.D. Senturia, Microsystem Design, Kluwer, 2001; V. Pott et al., Proc. IEEE 98, 2076 (2010).
Ques: The pull-in time coefficient is given as 3.67 and as 2.9. Which is right?
Both come from the same undamped lumped model with the spring force neglected, which holds for . Senturia keeps the electrostatic force at its initial value during the whole travel, which gives . The force actually grows as as the gap closes, and integrating the energy balance exactly gives (computed). For the exact value 2.9 is more likely to be right, and 3.67 is an upper estimate. Close to pull-in the spring slows the start, and a numerical integration with the spring gives 3.41 at , 3.06 at and 2.91 at (computed), so 3.67 is closer near pull-in. Squeeze-film damping lengthens both. Reference: S.D. Senturia, Microsystem Design, Kluwer, 2001 (constant-force estimate); the exact integral is my derivation.
Ques: Why does the contact resistance vary, and what sets it?
Two solid surfaces touch at a few asperities, so the electrical contact area is much smaller than the geometric area. For contact spots larger than the mean free path the resistance is the Holm constriction resistance , and for spots smaller than the mean free path it is the Sharvin resistance . The contact radius follows from the contact force and the elasticity (the Hertz expression for a smooth sphere on a plane), so the force of the beam on the contact sets the on-state resistance, and any oxide or contamination film adds a resistance in series. Reference: R. Holm, Electric Contacts: Theory and Application, 4th ed., Springer, 1967; O. Loh and H.D. Espinosa, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 283 (2012).
Related pages in this vault: Carbon Nanotube Random Access Memory (NRAM), RF MEMS Passives, Atomic Force Microscope (AFM), MEMS Optical Modulator.